SRI
had an important role in helping to cause the end of the apartheid
government in South Africa. From the 1970s to the early 1990s, large
institutions avoided investment in South Africa under apartheid. The
subsequent negative flow of investment eventually forced a group of
businesses, representing 75% of South African employers, to draft a
charter calling for an end to apartheid. While the SRI efforts alone
did not bring an end to apartheid, it did focus persuasive
international pressure on the South African business community and
the white minority government.
The
mid and late 1990s saw the rise of SRI’s focus on other issues,
including tobacco stocks, mutual fund proxy disclosure, and other
diverse focuses. Since the late 1990s, SRI has become increasingly
defined as a means to promote environmentally sustainable
development. Many investors consider effects of global climate change
a significant business and investment risk.
CSR
corporate social responsibility has now moved to include SRI socially
responsible investment in some cases. Mainly due to pressure from
investors but also because the fund managers were missing out on money from investors who would not invest in funds that were not
ethical. So the fund managers started new funds that were acceptable
to the investors. Remember the fund managers job is to get investors
money and invest to make more money for the investors and themselves.
Now quite a few banks and insurance companies also have SRI funds as
well as the unrestricted funds. The Coop bank which has always been
ethical and now comes under the umbrella of CIS, cooperative
insurance services, has several funds listed as SRI. Other banks such
as Barclays and HSBC also have SRI funds to suite ethical investors.
A
definition of CSR is 'Actions that appear to further some social
good' so a company has to go beyond the norm for the benefit of some
social good. This could be helping poverty in a third world country
or child slavery or helping impoverished communities. Whereas SRI
would be making sure that the investors money is only used in
instances that does not involve weapons for example, but should only
be used for a positive purpose to benefit society.
Take
the example of the Co-op who were the first supermarket to sell only
Fairtrade Bananas, the growers formed a cooperative and became
members of fairtrade that ensured that a premium from the sale of
bananas was returned to the growers. This helped the growers to
improve their community by building schools and improving there way
of life. The Co-op followed later by being the first to sell only
fairtrade chocolate. Now other supermarkets have followed and are
doing the same. So the Co-op is not only being CSR but also SRI.
Sources: Co-op Annual Report, Wikipedia, EIRIS Report
i am really interested of investing in SRI funds.. it gives a satisfaction and we know that how our value for money is created.but sometimes SRI funds and wealth creation of companies might be contradicting issues? wt do you think?
ReplyDelete